Notcoin Exposes Bitget: “This Is a Pure Lie!” The crypto community is reeling after Notcoin publicly refuted Bitget’s claims of their involvement with the PAWS project. In a scathing statement, Notcoin accused Bitget of spreading false information, sparking widespread debate. As tensions rise, all eyes are on Bitget to address the allegations and clarify the truth.
Notcoin Exposes Bitget: This Is a Pure Lie!
The cryptocurrency world has been thrown into a frenzy following a bold accusation by Notcoin, who stated that Bitget is spreading false information about their involvement with the PAWS project. In a recent video posted on Bitget’s official X account, the platform highlighted the potential of PAWS, a project that has seen meteoric growth in recent weeks. However, Notcoin quickly responded, outright denying any connection to the project and accusing Bitget of lying.
Their statement was unambiguous: “Notcoin has zero connection with this project. We never participated in PAWS or whatever it’s called. So this video is actually a pure lie.” This declaration has since sparked heated debates within the crypto community, with users divided over the legitimacy of Bitget’s claims and the rapid rise of PAWS.
DogS Joins the Conversation
Adding to the drama, DogS—a prominent community in the cryptocurrency ecosystem—also stepped in to distance themselves from PAWS. Their statement echoed similar concerns: “Dogs Community has no connections with this project. Don’t trust everything you see on the internet (even when the source seems reliable). Stay safe!”
These public denials from Notcoin and DogS directly contradict what many in the community believed. PAWS, which has achieved staggering numbers, including 42 million users, 17 million connected wallets, and 15 million Telegram subscribers, was initially thought to be associated with these two successful projects. The assumption fueled its rapid adoption and growing popularity.
What is PAWS, and Why is It Controversial?
PAWS has been marketed as one of the fastest-growing projects in the cryptocurrency space. In just a few weeks, it has become the #1 mini-app on Telegram, boasting millions of active users and generating considerable buzz. However, no official statements from PAWS ever indicated a direct link to Notcoin or DogS.
Instead, it appears the project has a partnership with Blum, a CEO who has openly supported PAWS from the beginning. While some speculate that Bitget used the reputations of Notcoin and DogS to boost PAWS’s credibility, others argue the controversy stems from misunderstandings within the community.
One user commented: “Paws themselves never stated anything about dogs or Notcoin, it’s just a partnership with Blum, so why the lies, Bitget?” Meanwhile, another questioned the timing of the denials: “Why didn’t y’all come out to say this when they first shilled their project to the community? I think it’s a matter of jealousy, that’s why #DOGS and #Notcoin are reacting to #PAWS now.”
The Community’s Reaction
As news of the controversy spreads, the crypto community is increasingly divided. On one side, there are those who believe Bitget may have overstated the associations between PAWS and established projects like Notcoin and DogS. This group calls for transparency, urging Bitget to address the accusations and clarify their claims.
On the other side, supporters of PAWS argue that the project’s success is independent of these associations. They highlight the impressive metrics achieved by PAWS in just a short period and suggest that the denials from Notcoin and DogS may stem from competitive concerns.
What’s Next for PAWS and Bitget?
While the controversy continues to unfold, the crypto community is left with more questions than answers. Is PAWS truly an independent success story, or has Bitget exaggerated its affiliations to generate buzz? Why did Notcoin and DogS wait until now to issue public denials?
For Bitget, the pressure to provide transparency is mounting. With accusations of misinformation and credibility on the line, the platform will need to address the issue head-on to regain trust.
As for PAWS, the project’s future remains uncertain. While it has gained millions of users in record time, its association with this controversy could either hinder or further accelerate its growth.
Conclusion
The statement that “Notcoin Accuses Bidget of Lying” has quickly become one of the most talked-about headlines in the crypto space. This controversy highlights the challenges of navigating trust and transparency in a rapidly evolving industry. As the debate continues, the crypto community will be watching closely to see how Bitget, Notcoin, DogS, and PAWS respond to this unfolding drama.